Chiasmus, Theory, & Binary Metaphysics
March 2, 2011 § 4 Comments
Care to elaborate?
By all means David – I just posted during a class where the reading was discussed.
I feel that the passage can be seen as a distinctly positive example of Lacan’s obscure and obfuscated prose. Where Analytic philosophy maintains a supposedly reasoned commitment to clarity of argument I think that Lacan’s critique comes from both the content of his writing and also the form of it.
My prof also drew out a connection between the term ‘concentrational’ and the (perhaps Levinasian) response to the Holocaust etc. I’m not sure if this is an accurate reading or even a helpful one.
And lastly, I appreciate that several schools of thought make appearances in the convoluted sentence such as utilitarianism, existentialism and Hegelianism (although I am not catching the reference to Hegelian murder).
What continues to stump me is understanding his understanding of freedom. Is he saying existentialism in its current form has offered a false freedom? Is ‘never more authentic’ supposed to be ironic or literal?
I know its a cop-out answer – but I don’t think we can ever be sure about that with Lacan
Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:
You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Google+ account. ( Log Out / Change )
Connecting to %s
Notify me of follow-up comments via email.
« Ray Brassier Interview
Time to Relax… »
You are currently reading Lacan Quotation: at Maxwell Kennel.
Blog at WordPress.com.
The Oulipo Theme.
Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.